BJS Academy>Continuing surgical ...>Chronic limb threate...
Surgical digest
Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia: current knowledge and future perspectives

Fabio Stocco
The Leeds Vascular Institute, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. The Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular Metabolic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Jing Yi Kwan
The Leeds Vascular Institute, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. The Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular Metabolic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Marc A. Bailey
The Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular Metabolic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Patrick A. Coughlin
The Leeds Vascular Institute, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK.
Related articles

BASIL-2 results explained
Andrew Bradbury
I have been asked to offer some thoughts on what the BASIL-2 trial may mean following publication of the headline results in the Lancet on 25 April 2023. The journey to BASIL-2 started around 25 years ago when I was a Senior Lecturer in Vascular Surgery at Edinburgh University, Scotland, and was fortunate enough to be awarded an NIHR HTA grant for the first BASIL, now known as the BASIL-1, trial. In the late 1990’s, the idea that one could treat chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), in those days called CLI or SIL (critical limb ischaemia or severe ischaemia of the leg), other than by means of bypass using either vein or prosthetic conduit was considered extremely controversial. There were real concerns that the endovascular management of CLTI was being adopted in the absence of good evidence that it was a clinically and cost effective treatment option. And that is why NIHR HTA put out a call for an RCT in this area of practice. We ran BASIL-1, first in Scotland, and then when I moved to Birmingham in 2000, across most of the UK between 1999 and 2004. In BASIL-1, a bypass first and a plain balloon angioplasty first revascularisation strategy resulted in similar amputation free survival out to 2 years. However, in patients who survived for two years, randomisation to bypass first was associated with significant improvement in overall survival and a trend towards improved amputation free survival. About 25% of the bypasses were prosthetic, which reflected practice at that time. Around 75% of the patients in BASIL-1 had a revascularisation that was limited to the femoro-popliteal segment. A post-hoc, sub-group analysis of approximately 100 BASIL-1 patients that had an infra-popliteal, with or without a femoro-popliteal, revascularisation also showed a trend in favour of (vein) bypass surgery.

A contemporary overview of the management of acute ilio-femoral deep vein thrombosis; why, how and where next?
Sandip Nandhra, Emma Wilton, Steve Black
DOI: 10.58974/bjss/azbc040 Download PDF Unprovoked acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common problem, affecting around 50 to 100 per 10000 people.1,2 A significant number of these (20%) will involve the iliac veins or inferior vena cava. The symptoms of acute DVT are well described and include, sudden onset of swelling, pain, redness and difficultly mobilising. On occasion the extent of venous congestion can be so severe it threatens the limb, a phenomenon termed phlegmasia.

2024 ASGBI BJS Lecture: Emergency general surgery model and acute mesenteric ischaemia – pathway
Matti Tolonen, MD, PhD, presents his BJS Lecture “Emergency general surgery model and acute mesenteric ischaemia – pathway” from the 2024 Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ASGBI) International Surgical Congress.
Copied!