This website uses cookies to improve your experience.

Cookie policy

Long term durability and clinical outcome of a prospective randomized trial comparing carotid endarterectomy with ACUSEAL polytetrafluoroethylene patching versus pericardial patching.


AbuRahma Z, Williams E, Lee A, Jordan MD, Veith C, Dargy N et al.

J Vasc Surg 2023; 77: 1694-1699.

Two hundred procedures were included in this study. After a median follow-up of 80 months, there was no difference in the rate of freedom from stroke: ACUSEAL 93 per cent, pericardial patch 92 per cent. Whilst rates of freedom from > 80 per cent recurrent stenosis were similar, more patients with the ACUSEAL developed stenosis > 50 per cent,  P=0.49.

Comment: Whilst no clinical differences were reported, this may be enough to dissuade vascular surgeons from using the PTFE patch.

Read paper

Academy


Part of the charitable activity of the Foundation, BJS Academy is an online educational resource for current and future surgeons.

The Academy is comprised of five distinct sections: Continuing surgical education, Young BJS, Cutting edge, Scientific surgery and Surgical news. Although the majority of this is open access, additional content is available to BJS subscribers and strategic partners.

Discover the Academy
Surgeon Training & Surgeons in Surgery